🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.